Wednesday, May 03, 2006

the tale of CaRMS

So,
There has been a very surprising development in the canadian residency matching system in the past day. It's got so many pairs of panties in so many knots I can't even begin to count them. So this is the story:

International medical graduates (IMGs) used to match only in the second round of CaRMS so that gave Canadian graduates first pick at residency spots. There history have been a few provinces that have set aside parallel match spots just for IMGs but this was by far the minority. To qualify the term IMG, these are usually people who are Canadian born but went to medical school in other countries because they could not get one of the very limited spots here and now wish to practice in Canada. There are also a handful of people who are landed immigrants in Canada and wish to convert their training in another country over to be a doctor here but they are in the minority.

What has happened now is that a bill was passed without anyone knowing about it stating that IMGs will now be able to participate in the first round of the CaRMS match. The reason everyone is in a snit about it is that the CaRMS ratio for spots to Canadian medical students will now be reduced to 1:1. This means that there will be one spot allocated for each graduating medical student.

A majority of these spots will be family spots. Traditionally family medicine spots go unmatched because there are far more family spots than people who want to do family. This is by in large because they are the cheapest spots for the government to fund, being only 2 year programs, and so all of the "new" spots they've created over the past few years have been family spots. If the residency match goes to a 1:1 it means that there will be a lot of people matched to family spots who do NOT want to do family medicine as a specialty. It also means that once you're in a residency there will be no way to switch programs unless it's within the same institution and you can convince the program directors to re-direct your funding. You may be saying to yourself "well, there's a doctor shortage, people should be forced to do family". Yes, there is a doctor shortage, that isn't limited to family doctors. There is also a specialist shortage in Canada. And the reality is, people who do not want to do primary care don't make good primary care physicians. These people will not do justice to a specialty that takes lots of time, effort and dedication.

Furthermore, there is a rumor that it's going to be a parallel match. This means that we will not be directly competing with IMGs for spots but there will be a certain number of residency spots allocated to the IMG CaRMS match and a certain number allocated to the Canadian grad carms match. There has been no strategy reveiled for how these spots will be allocated. If there's only one derm spot at a school, which stream will it be allocated to? If there are 2 ob/gyn spots, will one go to IMGs and one to Cangrads eventhough there are going to be way more cangrads than IMGs accepted into spots? Or will it be proportional? These are questions that need to be answered in the days to come.

From what I see this is really going to fuel resentment on the part of Canadian grads against foreign grads. I have no problem with foreign grads being funnelled back into the Canadian system. What I do have a problem with is the 1:1 ratio. I think the ratio should be atleast 1.2:1 which is approximately what it is now. Just adding IMGs into the additional .2 of the ratio to make the cangrad match 1:1 does NOT make sense. The biggest problem I feel is that the general public doesn't understand how residency works so the 1:1 ratio probably makes total sense in their minds. I mean, we all get to be doctors, right? It's going to be a hard task to explain adequately to the public what this new system will mean for the quality of their health care in the future.

Oh, and why did this all come about? A class action lawsuit! of course. A group of IMGs are threatening to sue every medical school in Canada because only letting IMGs match in the second round is, in their opinion, against the charters of rights and freedoms.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

As an "IMG" myself who got into US programs (old 6 year accelerated programs) and UK and Australian medical programs after highschool I can say that you guys deserve an allocation of 1.2:1.

Based on the carms stats for the PGY1 salaries, I feel really sorry for Canadian graduates. I really never realised how bad it was until I saw other systems. You have little support, work long hours (on average twice as long as us) and get paid half of what I will be getting PGY1 here in Australia...all I can say is you guys deserve all the funding from the gov't you can get!

Best of luck!

Anonymous said...

I strongly agree with the current change in the match system, and disagree with your position. Although the previous system gave canadian grads more choice among specialties, it was brutally unfair to IMGs, forcing them to pick from the leftovers of canadian graduates. IMGs and canadian grads equally deserve to apply to their preferred specialty, because as you have pointed out, one will not be a good gp if they don't want to be. Considering IMGs have to pass the same exams/standards to qualify for the match as canadian grads, the Canadian system remains hugely unfair to IMGs. This change, however, is a good start to the equality IMGs deserve.

Anonymous said...

PROIMG...
I'm not sure that you can even use the word deserve in this context.
IMGs are exactly that... INTERNATIONAL and are competing to be ranking in a CANADIAN TAXPAYER-FUNDED program to take part in taxpayer funded training. As such, there has been considerable investment that the Canadian public has made in each and every medical student that graduates and deserve to see the payoff of that investment. As you have readily admitted, a physician who is forced into an area of study that does not carry his/her interest is doomed to doing both himself or herself a personal disservice, but also to short-change patients (ie. the Canadian taxpayer) due to lack of interest, drive, performace, etc. Consequently, as any investor would do, the Candian public has a right to ensure that their investments have the highest liklihood of succeeding.

And if that means that IMGs, the majority of whom were simply not able to stand up to the rigors and requirments of being awarded the Canadian taxpayer's trust, are unable to practice the fields of their respective choices, then so be it. They are afterall, asking to be guests in a system for Canadians, by Canadians and they are simply not welcome.

Anonymous said...

Yeah, right. How noble our sacrifice is to the taxpayer. I'm a medical student (full disclosure), but I have to admit that the system is designed to keep doctors wages higher than they would be in a labor market at equilibrium (look up what doctors get paid in France and you'll see what I mean - about as much as a teacher)
Also, look up the following economic concepts and you'll understand exactly why Canada lets in far fewer IMGs (by order of magnitude- almost half of all US residencies currently go to IMGs.)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scarcity_value

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartel

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_rent

You know as well as I do that if we didn't win the admissions game we would all be far less smug about the IMG situation.